Bobby Lee McArthur v. Robert W. Clark

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-1730
BOBBY LEE MCARTHUR; DEBORAH E. MCARTHUR,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
versus
ROBERT W. CLARK; DEBRA L. CLARK; FRED W. LEE,
JR.; BARBARA OSIE LEE; JAMES ROBERT LEE; CAROL
E. LEE; JOHN HENRY LEE; PATRICIA SMITH LEE,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at New Bern. Louise W. Flanagan, Chief
District Judge. (5:05-cv-00634-FL)
Submitted: March 16, 2007 Decided: April 17, 2007
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James Murrel Cooper, COOPER, DAVIS & COOPER, Fayetteville, North
Carolina, for Appellants. H. Terry Hutchens, HUTCHENS, SENTER &
BRITTON, Fayetteville, North Carolina, for Appellees Robert W.
Clark and Debra L. Clark. Fred W. Lee, Jr., Barbara Osie Lee,
James Robert Lee, Carol E. Lee, John Henry Lee, Patricia Smith Lee,
Appellees Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Bobby Lee McArthur and Deborah E. McArthur appeal the
district court’s order granting Defendants’ motion to dismiss the
complaint pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1), 12(b)(6) and
12(b)(7), and denying the McArthurs’ motion for preliminary
injunction as moot. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by
the district court. See McArthur v. Clark, No. 5:05-cv-00634-FL
(E.D.N.C. May 24, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --