Margaret Kinnally v. Marriott International, Incorporated

06-1335Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit11 oct. 2006

Texte intégral

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-1335
MARGARET KINNALLY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INCORPORATED,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Beaufort. Patrick Michael Duffy, District
Judge. (9:04-cv-02065-PMD)
Submitted: August 31, 2006 Decided: October 11, 2006
Before MICHAEL, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Margaret Kinnally, Appellant Pro Se. Catherine Brawley Templeton,
OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, PC, Charleston, South
Carolina; Charles Edward Engeman, OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK &
STEWART, LLC, St. Thomas, Virgin Islands, for Appellee
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Margaret Kinnally appeals the district court’s orders
adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and granting
summary judgment to Marriott in her civil action alleging
employment discrimination based on age and denying Kinnally’s
motion to alter or amend the judgment. We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. See Kinnally v. Marriott
Int’l, Inc., No. 9:04-cv-02065-PMD (D.S.C. Jan. 5, 2006). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.