Barry Neil Houchens v. Sergeant Huddleston

05-7628Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit26 avr. 2006

Texte intégral

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-7628
BARRY NEIL HOUCHENS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
SERGEANT HUDDLESTON; GERALD K. WASHINGTON;
SERGEANT CATRONE,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Senior District
Judge. (CA-05-246-7)
Submitted: April 7, 2006 Decided: April 26, 2006
Before LUTTIG, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Barry Neil Houchens, Appellant Pro Se. Mark Ralph Davis, OFFICE OF
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Barry Neil Houchens appeals the district court’s order
granting Defendants’ motion for summary judgment in his action
under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000). We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. See Houchens v. Huddleston, No. CA-
05-246-7 (W.D. Va. Oct. 4, 2005). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.