Muhammad A. Aziz v. Central Virginia Regional Jail

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-7310
MUHAMMAD A. AZIZ,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
CENTRAL VIRGINIA REGIONAL JAIL,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, District
Judge. (CA-04-732-7)
Submitted: August 9, 2006 Decided: August 31, 2006
Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Muhammad A. Aziz, Appellant Pro Se. Helen Eckert Phillips,
Stanardsville, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

*While Aziz attempted to amend his complaint to name two
individual defendants in his objections to the magistrate judge’s
report, the purported amendment was proffered beyond the time
permitted by the magistrate judge for Aziz to amend his complaint.
Because the purported amendment was not considered by the district
court, this court’s affirmance is only as to the dismissal of
Aziz’s complaint against the Central Virginia Regional Jail. We
accordingly have not considered the legal merit, if any, of Aziz’s
claims against any individuals who may have participated in the
incidents that underlie Aziz’s complaint.
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Muhammad A. Aziz appeals the district court’s order
adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. * See Aziz v. Central
Virginia Reg’l Jail, No. CA-04-732-7 (W.D. Va. filed Aug. 12, 2005;
entered Aug. 15, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --