George Randolph Sutton, Jr v. RICK FARFORD, Goldsboro Sheriff Officer Detective

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-7260
GEORGE RANDOLPH SUTTON, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
RICK FARFORD, Goldsboro Sheriff Officer
Detective; GEORGE RACHEL, Sheriff Department
Supervisor,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, Senior
District Judge. (CA-04-900-5)
Submitted: August 24, 2006 Decided: August 28, 2006
Before KING, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
George Randolph Sutton, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

*To the extent Sutton seeks to appeal the district court’s
prior order dismissing his complaint as frivolous, we are without
jurisdiction to consider his arguments because his notice of appeal
was untimely as to that order.
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
George Randolph Sutton, Jr. appeals the district court’s
order denying his motions to amend his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000)
complaint, for an answer to his amended complaint, and to compel an
answer following the district court’s dismissal of his initial
complaint as frivolous. * We have reviewed the record and find no
abuse of discretion or reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. See Sutton v.
Farford, No. CA-04-900-5 (E.D.N.C. filed July 18, 2006; entered
July 22, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --