Ace Chaney v. Golden Chance Mining

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-1940
ACE CHANEY,
Petitioner,
versus
GOLDEN CHANCE MINING; WEST VIRGINIA
COAL-WORKERS’ PNEUMOCONIOSIS FUND; DIRECTOR,
OFFICE OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION PROGRAMS,
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR,
Respondents.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board.
(05-130-BLA)
Submitted: February 24, 2006 Decided: March 13, 2006
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Leonard Stayton, Inez, Kentucky, for Petitioner. Robert Weinberger,
WORKERS’ COMPENSATION DEFENSE DIVISION, Charleston, West Virginia;
Howard M. Radzely, Solicitor of Labor, Allen H. Feldman, Associate
Solicitor, Christian P. Barber, Counsel for Appellate Litigation,
Jeffrey S. Goldberg, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Washington,
D.C., for Respondents.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Ace Chaney seeks review of the Benefits Review Board’s
decision and order affirming the administrative law judge’s denial
of black lung benefits pursuant to 30 U.S.C. §§ 901-945 (2000).
Our review of the record discloses that the Board’s decision is
based upon substantial evidence and is without reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the Board. See
Chaney v. Golden Chance Mining, No. 05-130-BLA (BRB June 29, 2005).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --