Thomas v. Prevenslik

*Judge Luttig was a member of the original panel but did not
participate in this decision. The opinion is filed by a quorum of
the panel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 46(d).
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-1914
THOMAS V. PREVENSLIK,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
UNITED STATES PATENT & TRADEMARK OFFICE; JAMES
E. ROGAN; JOHN R. LEE; BERNARD E. SOUW,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, District
Judge. (CA-05-498-TSE-LO)
Submitted: April 28, 2006 Decided: May 24, 2006
Before LUTTIG, * GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Thomas V. Prevenslik, Appellant Pro Se. Gerard John Mene, OFFICE
OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Thomas V. Prevenslik appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on this qui tam action under 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915(e)(2)(B) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
district court. See Prevenslik v. U.S. Patent and Trademark
Office, No. CA-05-498-TSE-LO (E.D. Va. June 16, 2005). We deny the
motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --