Dallice M. Allen v. Social Security Administration

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-1646
DALLICE M. ALLEN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION,
Defendant - Appellee,
and
KATHLEEN A. MIKA; DENISE RIDDLE; BLAKE GORDAN;
SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY AND APPEALS,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Spartanburg. Henry F. Floyd, District Judge.
(CA-04-280)
Submitted: December 22, 2005 Decided: January 4, 2006
Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Dallice M. Allen, Appellant Pro Se. Marvin Jennings Caughman,
Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for
Appellee.

-- 1 of 3 --

- 2 -
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 2 of 3 --

- 3 -
PER CURIAM:
Dallice Allen appeals from the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing
her complaint in which she asserted that the Social Security
Administration unlawfully suspended her benefits. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on
the reasoning of the district court. See Allen v. Social Security
Admin., No. CA-04-280 (D.S.C. filed Feb. 18, 2005; entered Feb. 22,
2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 3 of 3 --