Kevin Potter v. Nationwide Mutual Automobile Insurance Company

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-1474
KEVIN POTTER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
NATIONWIDE MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE
COMPANY; NATIONWIDE MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE
COMPANY,
Intervenors/Plaintiffs - Appellees,
versus
MARGUERITE C. POTTER; HARRY H. POTTER,
Defendants - Appellants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (CA-00-
63-AMD)
Submitted: February 13, 2006 Decided: March 1, 2006
Before KING, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kevin Potter, Marguerite C. Potter, and Harry H. Potter, Appellants
Pro Se. Patricia McHugh Lambert, Robert St. John Campbell, HODES,
ULMAN, PESSIN & KATZ, P.A., Towson, Maryland, for Appellees.

-- 1 of 3 --

- 2 -
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 2 of 3 --

*This court has limited its review to the issues discussed in
Appellants’ informal briefs. See 4th Cir. Rule 34(b).
- 3 -
PER CURIAM:
Kevin Potter, Marguerite C. Potter, and Harry H. Potter
appeal the district court’s final order granting Defendants’ motion
for summary judgment and district court orders dated May 15, 2000,
Nov. 28, 2000, Mar. 29, 2001, Aug. 22, 2001, Oct. 23, 2001, and
magistrate judge’s report and recommendation dated Mar. 5, 2003,
and order dated Mar. 17, 2003. * We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning
of the district court. See Potter v. Nationwide Mut. Auto. Ins.
Co., No. CA-00-63-AMD (D. Md. Mar. 28, 2005). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 3 of 3 --