Arthur D. Walker v. New Delaware Fuel Corporation

05-1210Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit14 juin 2005

Texte intégral

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-1210
ARTHUR D. WALKER,
Petitioner,
versus
NEW DELAWARE FUEL CORPORATION; WEST VIRGINIA
COAL-WORKERS’ PNEUMOCONIOSIS FUND; DIRECTOR,
OFFICE OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION PROGRAMS,
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR,
Respondents.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board
(04-342-BLA)
Submitted: June 9, 2005 Decided: June 14, 2005
Before NIEMEYER and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Arthur D. Walker, Petitioner Pro Se. Robert Weinberger, STATE OF
WEST VIRGINIA, Charleston, West Virginia; Patricia May Nece,
Jeffrey Steven Goldberg, Christian P. Barber, UNITED STATES
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Washington, D.C., for Respondents.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Arthur D. Walker seeks review of the Benefits Review
Board’s decision and order affirming the administrative law judge’s
denial of black lung benefits pursuant to 30 U.S.C. §§ 901-945
(2000). Our review of the record discloses that the Board’s
decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
Board. See Walker v. New Delaware Fuel Corp., No. 04-342-BLA (BRB
Jan. 7, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.