Janet L. Thompson v. West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-2534
JANET L. THOMPSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
WEST VIRGINIA SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS; CAROL
FOUTY; KANAWHA COUNTY, Magistrate Court;
ROBERT H. SLACK; JAMES M. ALBERT; ARTHUR G.
ANGUST; BARBARA ALLEN; JIMMY THAXTON; WILLIAM
E. MURRAY; CHRIS WORKMAN; JANICE ISAACS;
BRENDA RICHARDS; JUDY BLAKER,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF THE SUPREME COURT OF
APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern
District of West Virginia, at Charleston. John T. Copenhaver, Jr.,
District Judge. (CA-02-353-2)
Submitted: February 24, 2005 Decided: March 4, 2005
Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

-- 1 of 3 --

- 2 -
Janet L. Thompson, Appellant Pro Se. John M. Hedges, Teresa Jean
Lyons, BYRNE & HEDGES, Morgantown, West Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 2 of 3 --

- 3 -
PER CURIAM:
Janet L. Thompson appeals the district court’s order
adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and dismissing her
Title VII claim and granting immunity with respect to her 42 U.S.C.
§§ 1981, 1983 (2000) claims. We have reviewed the record and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of
the district court. See Thompson v. West Virginia Supreme Court of
Appeals, No. CA-02-353-2 (S.D.W. Va. Dec. 6, 2004). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 3 of 3 --