Thomas L. Switzer v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392, 10 F.3d 1064, 1066-67 4th Cir. 1993 . We also deny…

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-2150
THOMAS L. SWITZER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
MARSHA GARST,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Harrisonburg. Samuel G. Wilson, District
Judge. (CA-04-64-SGW)
Submitted: January 28, 2005 Decided: February 25, 2005
Before WILLIAMS, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Thomas L. Switzer, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Thomas L. Switzer appeals the district court’s orders
denying his application to proceed in forma pauperis, denying his
request for reconsideration, and dismissing without prejudice his
civil action as frivolous. Because the dismissal was without
prejudice, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because
the order is not a final, appealable order. See Domino Sugar
Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392, 10 F.3d 1064, 1066-67 (4th
Cir. 1993). We also deny Switzer’s motion to proceed in forma
pauperis on appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
DISMISSED

-- 2 of 2 --