Nick Roselli v. Universal Underwriters Insurance Company

04-1694Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit11 févr. 2005

Texte intégral

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-1694
NICK ROSELLI,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
UNIVERSAL UNDERWRITERS INSURANCE COMPANY,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Florence. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge.
(CA-02-4097-4-25BH)
Submitted: January 14, 2005 Decided: February 11, 2005
Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
William F. O’Neil, III, O’NEIL & CHANDLER, L.L.C., Myrtle Beach,
South Carolina, for Appellant. Bradford N. Martin, William S.F.
Freeman, WALKER, MARTIN & REIBOLD, L.L.C., Greenville, South
Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Nick Roselli appeals the district court’s order granting
summary judgment to Universal Underwriters Insurance Company on
Roselli’s action for insurance coverage for an accident that
occurred on July 4, 2000. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by
the district court. See Roselli v. Universal Underwriters Ins.
Co., No. CA-02-4097-4-25BH (D.S.C. Apr. 30, 2004). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.