Curlee Sherman v. Orangeburg Mental Health

04-1580Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit20 sept. 2004

Texte intégral

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-1580
CURLEE SHERMAN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
ORANGEBURG MENTAL HEALTH,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Orangeburg. Margaret B. Seymour, District
Judge. (CA-04-585-5)
Submitted: August 25, 2004 Decided: September 20, 2004
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Curlee Sherman, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Curlee Sherman appeals the district court’s judgment
adopting the magistrate judge’s order that dismissed his complaint
pursuant to a previously entered prefiling review order. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
although we grant leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Sherman
v. Orangeburg Mental Health, No. CA-04-585-5 (D.S.C. filed Apr. 22,
2004, entered Apr. 23, 2004). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.