Federal Kemper Life Assurance Company v. Finglass, No. CA-03-81-AMD D. Md. Jan. 20, 2004 . We grant Finglass’s motion to…

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-1155
FEDERAL KEMPER LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
and
KAREN ANN LEIMBACH,
Defendant - Appellee,
versus
DEAN SCOTT FINGLASS,
Defendant - Appellant,
and
CARON BETH FINGLASS,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge.
(CA-03-81-AMD)
Submitted: May 5, 2004 Decided: May 17, 2004
Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

-- 1 of 3 --

- 2 -
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Dean Scott Finglass, Appellant Pro Se. Rob Ross Hendrickson, BOYD,
BENSON & HENDRICKSON, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee Leimbach.
Bryan David Bolton, Hisham M. Amin, FUNK & BOLTON, P.A., Baltimore,
Maryland, for Appellee Federal Kemper Life Assurance Company.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 2 of 3 --

- 3 -
PER CURIAM:
Dean Scott Finglass appeals the district court’s order
and judgment of interpleader granting Karen Ann Leimbach’s motion
for summary judgment. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by
the district court. See Federal Kemper Life Assurance Co. v.
Finglass, No. CA-03-81-AMD (D. Md. Jan. 20, 2004). We grant
Finglass’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 3 of 3 --