Curlee Sherman v. Department of Social Services

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-1083
CURLEE SHERMAN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES,
Defendant - Appellee.
No. 04-1296
CURLEE SHERMAN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES,
Defendant - Appellee,
No. 04-1303
CURLEE SHERMAN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus

-- 1 of 3 --

- 2 -
DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES ORANGEBURG
COUNTY,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Orangeburg. Margaret B. Seymour, District
Judge. (CA-03-3794-5-24BC; CA-04-160-5)
Submitted: May 28, 2004 Decided: June 18, 2004
Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Curlee Sherman, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 2 of 3 --

- 3 -
PER CURIAM:
In these consolidated appeals, Curlee Sherman appeals the
district court’s orders in No. 04-1083 and No. 04-1303 accepting
the recommendations of the magistrate judge and denying relief on
his complaints based on Eleventh Amendment immunity. In No. 04-
1296, he appeals the district court’s denial of his motion for
transcripts relating to No. 04-1083. We have reviewed the records
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Sherman’s
motions for general relief and his appellate motion for
transcripts, grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. See Sherman v.
Department Social Servs., No. CA-03-3794-5-24BC (D.S.C. Dec. 31,
2003; Feb. 24, 2004); No. CA-04-160-5 (D.S.C. Feb. 20, 2004). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 3 of 3 --