James Lamont Johnson v. Sharp, No. CA-03-810-1 M.D.N.C. Nov. 3, 2003 . We deny Johnson’s motions for an…

03-7864Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit20 avr. 2004

Texte intégral

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-7864
JAMES LAMONT JOHNSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
P.T. SHARP, Magistrate Judge; PAUL A. WEINMAN,
Assistant United States Attorney,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Durham. James A. Beaty, Jr.,
District Judge. (CA-03-810-1)
Submitted: April 15, 2004 Decided: April 20, 2004
Before NIEMEYER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James Lamont Johnson, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
James Lamont Johnson appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915(e)(2)(B) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find that
this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on
the reasoning of the district court. See Johnson v. Sharp, No.
CA-03-810-1 (M.D.N.C. Nov. 3, 2003). We deny Johnson’s motions for
an injunction, for a restraining order, and to stay the case. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED

-- 2 of 2 --

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.