Mario N. Hughley v. Carrie Basham, Lpn

03-7315Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit23 mars 2004

Texte intégral

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-7315
MARIO N. HUGHLEY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
CARRIE BASHAM, LPN; JOHN R. BARNETT, M.D.;
LALANI D. MCCANN, M.D.; CORRECTIONS
CORPORATION OF AMERICA; PRISON REALTY
CORPORATION, formerly known as Corrections
Corporation of America; PATRICIA A. TERRANGI;
J. D. TERRY; RONALD ANGELONE; M. VERNON SMITH,
M.D.; DOE #1; JANE/JOHN DOE #2; JANE/JOHN DOE
#3,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
JACKIE R. SMITH,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District
Judge. (CA-03-85-2)
Submitted: February 25, 2004 Decided: March 23, 2004
Before LUTTIG, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

-- 1 of 3 --

- 2 -
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
John L. Watts, BREIT, DRESCHER & IMPREVENTO, P.C., Norfolk,
Virginia; O. L. Gilbert, GILBERT & ALBISTON, Norfolk, Virginia, for
Appellant. Carlyle R. Wimbish, III, Kenneth T. Roeber, SANDS,
ANDERSON, MARKS & MILLER, P.C., Richmond, Virginia; John D.
McChesney, RAWLS & MCNELIS, P.C., Richmond, Virginia; Mark R.
Davis, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia; Kerri
Borchardt Taylor, MORIN & BARKLEY, Charlottesville, Virginia, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 2 of 3 --

- 3 -
PER CURIAM:
Mario N. Hughley appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint pursuant to Fed.
R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6), as barred by the statute of limitations. We
have reviewed the parties’ briefs and joint appendix and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by
the district court. See Hughley v. Basham, No. CA-03-85-2 (E.D.
Va. filed Aug. 1, 2003 & entered Aug. 4, 2003). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 3 of 3 --

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.