Engram M. Bellamy v. MICHAEL M. CLATTERBUCK, Magistrate

03-6221Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit26 mai 2004

Texte intégral

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-6221
ENGRAM M. BELLAMY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
MICHAEL M. CLATTERBUCK, Magistrate,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior
District Judge. (CA-02-1133)
Submitted: November 17, 2003 Decided: May 26, 2004
Before LUTTIG and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Engram M. Bellamy, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Engram M. Bellamy appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28
U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Bellamy’s motion for
appointment of counsel and affirm on the reasoning of the district
court. See Bellamy v. Clatterbuck, No. CA-02-1133 (W.D. Va. Nov.
12, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.