Austin Skinner v. NASEER MOBASHAR, Physician

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-6181
AUSTIN SKINNER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
NASEER MOBASHAR, Physician; B. C. ELLIOTT,
Psychiatrist; M. ALTIZER,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Senior District
Judge. (CA-01-915-7)
Submitted: April 18, 2003 Decided: May 29, 2003
Before KING, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Austin Skinner, Appellant Pro Se. Jim Harold Guynn, Jr., GUYNN &
MEMMER, P.C., Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Austin Skinner appeals the district court’s order dismissing
with prejudice his claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000), and
dismissing without prejudice any and all state law claims
implicated by the pleadings. We have reviewed the record and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. See Skinner v. Mobashar, No. CA-01-915-7
(W.D. Va. Dec. 17, 2002). Skinner’s motion for appointment of
counsel is denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --