Hartzel Ray Foster v. HOWARD PAINTER, Warden

02-7784Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit27 janv. 2003

Texte intégral

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-7784
HARTZEL RAY FOSTER,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
HOWARD PAINTER, Warden,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
District of West Virginia, at Elkins. Robert Earl Maxwell, Senior
District Judge. (CA-99-48-2)
Submitted: January 16, 2003 Decided: January 27, 2003
Before WILLIAMS, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Hartzel Ray Foster, Appellant Pro Se. Silas Bent Taylor, Deputy
Attorney General, Dawn Ellen Warfield, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY
GENERAL OF WEST VIRGINIA, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Hartzel Ray Foster appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Foster v.
Painter, No. CA-99-48-2 (N.D.W. Va. Nov. 7, 2002). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.