Lloyd Lewis v. Thomas Breedlove

02-6470Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit24 juil. 2002

Texte intégral

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-6470
LLOYD LEWIS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
THOMAS BREEDLOVE; CHARLES HAWLEY; DAVID HUNT,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
VANCE COUNTY JAIL; COUNTY OF VANCE,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief
District Judge. (CA-01-113-5-BO, CA-01-123-5-BO)
Submitted: July 18, 2002 Decided: July 24, 2002
Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Lloyd Lewis, Appellant Pro Se. Mark Allen Davis, Douglas William
Hanna, WOMBLE, CARLYLE, SANDRIDGE & RICE, Raleigh, North Carolina,
for Appellees.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Lloyd Lewis appeals the district court’s order denying relief
on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2001) complaint. We have
reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
district court. Lewis v. Breedlove, Nos. CA-01-113-5-BO; CA-01-
123-5-BO (E.D.N.C. filed Feb. 12, 2002; entered Feb. 13, 2002). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.