Mansa Musa Banshee, formerly known as Stanley Rembert Butler v. William E. Gunn

02-6414Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit28 mai 2002

Texte intégral

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-6414
MANSA MUSA BANSHEE, formerly known as Stanley
Rembert Butler,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
WILLIAM E. GUNN; CHARLES M. CONDON,
Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Greenville. Matthew J. Perry, Jr., Senior
District Judge. (CA-01-2349-6-10)
Submitted: May 16, 2002 Decided: May 28, 2002
Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Mansa Musa Banshee, Appellant Pro Se. William Edgar Salter, III,
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Columbia, South
Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Mansa Musa Banshee appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 &
Supp. 2001). The district court granted Banshee’s motion for a
certificate of appealability. We have reviewed the record and the
district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the
magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Banshee v. Gunn,
No. CA-01-2349-6-10 (D.S.C. Feb. 21, 2002). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.