Charles W. Ezell v. Dan River, Incorporated

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-2314
CHARLES W. EZELL,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
DAN RIVER, INCORPORATED,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Danville. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior
District Judge. (CA-02-17-4)
Submitted: March 24, 2003 Decided: April 17, 2003
Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Charles W. Ezell, Appellant Pro Se. James Phillip Naughton, Sara
Lynne Berg, HUNTON & WILLIAMS, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Charles W. Ezell appeals the district court’s order granting
summary judgment in favor of Dan River, Inc. (“Dan River”), his
former employer, in this action alleging retaliation in violation
of the Americans with Disabilities Act. We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. See Ezell v. Dan River, Inc.,
No. CA-02-17-4 (W.D. Va. Nov. 1, 2002). We deny Dan River’s motions
to exclude an affidavit attached to Ezell’s informal brief and to
exclude Ezell’s reply brief and deny, as moot, Ezell’s motion
seeking an extension of time to file a response to the motion to
exclude the affidavit. We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --