John R. Drayer, Jr v. Drayer, court appointed attorney, individually

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-1577
JOHN R. DRAYER, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY POLITICAL SUB-DIVISION, in
its capacity as employers of officers and
agents, department, judiciary system,
Defendant - Appellee.
No. 02-1578
JOHN R. DRAYER, JR.
Plaintiff - Appellant,
and
JRS INTERNATIONAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT
CORPORATION, Nassau, the Bahamas,
Plaintiff,
versus
ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY POLITICAL SUB-DIVISION,
political sub-division in its capacity as
employers of officers, agents, departments,
judiciary system; ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY TRIAL

-- 1 of 5 --

2
TEAM, in its capacity reviewing proceedings
guardianship, M.V. Drayer resulting civil
suits/caveates; ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY POLICE
DEPARTMENT, individually/corporately in their
capacities as police; AGENT BERGER, social
services, individually and in his capacity as
social services agent for Anne Arundel County;
ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY JUDICIAL SYSTEM, orphans,
circuit district courts, individually/
corporately in their capacity as officials of
judiciary; MARY V. DRAYER, court appointed
attorney, individually and corporately in the
capacity as officer/courts by judicial
appointments/judges; ATTORNEY BELL, Anne
Arundel County States Attorneys, action/
inaction in capacities of office, officers of
the county individually/corporately; CLERK, of
Anne Arundel County, recorders, in capacity of
office, land records, individually and
corporately; SHERIF JOHNSON; MAYOR JOHNSON,
Anne Arundel County, in his official capacity
as mayor, Annapolis; OTHER JOE DOES, listed/
complaints/pleadings; COURT OF APPEALS OF
MARYLAND, Docket #605; SUPREME COURT OF
APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA, Docket #534,
Defendants - Appellees.
No. 02-1669
JOHN R. DRAYER, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY POLITICAL SUB-DIVISION, in
its capacity as employers of officers and
agents, departments, judiciary system,
Defendant - Appellee.

-- 2 of 5 --

3
No. 02-1670
JOHN R. DRAYER, JR.
Plaintiff - Appellant,
and
JRS INTERNATIONAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT
CORPORATION, Nassau, the Bahamas,
Plaintiff,
versus
ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY POLITICAL SUB-DIVISION,
political sub-division in its capacity as
employers of officers, agents, departments,
judiciary system; ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY TRIAL
TEAM, in its capacity reviewing proceedings
guardianship, M.V. Drayer resulting civil
suits/caveates; ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY POLICE
DEPARTMENT, individually/corporately in their
capacities as police; AGENT BERGER, social
services, individually and in his capacity as
social services agent for Anne Arundel County;
ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY JUDICIAL SYSTEM, orphans,
circuit district courts, individually/
corporately in their capacity as officials of
judiciary; MARY V. DRAYER, court appointed
attorney, individually and corporately in the
capacity as officer/courts by judicial
appointments/judges; ATTORNEY BELL, Anne
Arundel County States Attorneys, action/
inaction in capacities of office, officers of
the county individually/corporately; CLERK, of
Anne Arundel County, recorders, in capacity of
office, land records, individually and
corporately; SHERIF JOHNSON; MAYOR JOHNSON,
Anne Arundel County, in his official capacity
as mayor, Annapolis; OTHER JOE DOES, listed/
complaints/pleadings; COURT OF APPEALS OF

-- 3 of 5 --

4
MARYLAND, Docket #605; SUPREME COURT OF
APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA, Docket #534,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, Chief District Judge.
(CA-00-1221-S, CA-01-729-S)
Submitted: August 20, 2002 Decided: August 30, 2002
Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
John R. Drayer, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 4 of 5 --

5
PER CURIAM:
In these consolidated appeals, John R. Drayer, Jr., appeals
the district court’s orders denying his motions under Fed. R. Civ.
P. 59 and 60, denying his motions to file belated appeals, denying
his motion for preparation of transcripts at government expense,
and denying leave to appeal in forma pauperis. We have reviewed
the records and the district court’s opinions and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we deny the motions for leave to
proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeals on the reasoning
of the district court. See Drayer v. Anne Arundel County, Nos. CA-
00-1221-S; CA-01-729-S (D. Md. May 21, 2002). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED

-- 5 of 5 --