Robert E. Meade v. RONALD SILKWORTH, Judge

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-1345
ROBERT E. MEADE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
RONALD SILKWORTH, Judge; CLAYTON GREENE, JR.,
Judge; THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR ANNE ARUNDEL
COUNTY,
Defendants - Appellees.
No. 02-1750
ROBERT E. MEADE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
RONALD SILKWORTH, Judge; THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR
ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY; GAIL SCHAFFER, Judge;
JUDITH DUCKETT, Judge; NANCY PHELPS, Judge;
THE ORPHANS’ COURT FOR ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Marvin J. Garbis, District Judge. (CA-02-
558-MJG, CA-02-1854-MJG, CA-02-1859-MJG)

-- 1 of 2 --

2
Submitted: August 29, 2002 Decided: September 25, 2002
Before NIEMEYER and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Robert E. Meade, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Robert E. Meade appeals the district court’s orders denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaints. We have reviewed
the record and the district court’s opinions and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm substantially on the reasoning of
the district court. See Meade v. Silkworth, No. CA-02-558-MJG (D.
Md. Feb. 26, 2002); Meade v. Silkworth, No. CA-02-1854-MJG; No. CA-
02-1859-MJG (D. Md. June 4, 2002). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --