Sudharmi v. Haitham S. Sadeq

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-1006
SUDHARMI,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
HAITHAM S. SADEQ; ROLA A. SABBAGH,
Defendants - Appellants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Thomas Rawles Jones, Jr.,
Magistrate Judge. (CA-00-1451-A)
Submitted: May 29, 2002 Decided: June 11, 2002
Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Haitham S. Sadeq, Rola M. Sabbagh, Appellants Pro Se. Matthew
William Rau, Arlington, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

* The parties consented to the jurisdiction of a magistrate
judge under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (1994).
2
PER CURIAM:
Haitham S. Sadeq and Rola A. Sabbagh appeal the magistrate
judge’s order awarding judgment in favor of Appellee in this action
filed under the Fair Labor Standards Act.* We have reviewed the
magistrate judge’s opinion and order and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the magistrate judge.
See Sudharmi v. Sadeq, No. CA-00-1451-A (E.D. Va. Nov. 26, 2001).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --