Chuks Evaristus Nwaneri v. JOHN ASHCROFT, U. S. Attorney General

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-8009
CHUKS EVARISTUS NWANERI,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
JOHN ASHCROFT, U. S. Attorney General; JANET
RENO, Former U. S. Attorney General; WILLIAM
BARR, Attorney General; RICHARD D. BENNETT, U.
S. Attorney; LYNNE ANN BATTAGLIA, U. S. Attor-
ney; ROBERT HARDING, Assistant U. S. Attorney;
JAN MILLER, Assistant U. S. Attorney; JEFF
BIELSKI, D. E. A. Agent,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, District Judge. (CA-
01-3059-JFM)
Submitted: February 14, 2002 Decided: February 27, 2002
Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Chuks Evaristus Nwaneri, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Chuks Evaristus Nwaneri appeals from the district court’s
orders dismissing his action and denying his motion for reconsid-
eration. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s
memorandum and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on
the reasoning of the district court. Nwaneri v. Ashcroft, No. CA-
01-3059-JFM (D. Md. Oct. 22 & Nov. 8, 2001). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --