United States of America v. Dwight Lamont Hunter

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-7891
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
DWIGHT LAMONT HUNTER,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Chief
District Judge. (CR-94-111-MU, CA-00-71-3-MU)
Submitted: March 27, 2002 Decided: May 1, 2002
Before MICHAEL, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Dwight Lamont Hunter, Appellant Pro Se. Robert James Conrad, Jr.,
United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Dwight Lamont Hunter seeks to appeal the district court’s
order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.
2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate
of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the
district court. See United States v. Hunter, Nos. CR-94-111-MU;
CA-00-71-3-MU (W.D.N.C. Aug. 31, 2001). Hunter’s pending “Motion
to Amend” is granted insofar as the additional pleadings are
construed as a supplemental informal brief and afforded appropriate
consideration by the court. We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
DISMISSED

-- 2 of 2 --