United States of America v. Donald Kirkland, a/k/a Popcorn

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-6965
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
DONALD KIRKLAND, a/k/a Popcorn,
Defendant - Appellant.
No. 01-7012
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
MAYSO A. LAWRENCE, JR.,
Defendant - Appellant.
No. 01-7073
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,

-- 1 of 3 --

2
versus
MARTHA CHARICE COOK,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Herbert N. Maletz, Senior Judge, sitting
by designation. (CR-89-391-JFM)
Submitted: November 8, 2001 Decided: November 21, 2001
Before WILKINS, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Donald Kirkland, Mayso A. Lawrence, Jr., Martha Charice Cook,
Appellants Pro Se. Andrea L. Smith, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES
ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland; John Vincent Geise, OFFICE OF THE
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 2 of 3 --

3
PER CURIAM:
Appellants appeal from the district court’s order denying
their 18 U.S.C.A. § 3582 (West 2000) motions for reduced sentences.
We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm substantially on
the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Kirkland;
United States v. Lawrence; United States v. Cook, No. CR-89-391-JFM
(D. Md. May 30, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate-
rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED

-- 3 of 3 --