Haile-Eyesus Asmerew Endeshaw v. INS, 181 F.3d 587, 595 4th Cir. 1999

01-1469Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit26 nov. 2001

Texte intégral

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-1469
HAILE-EYESUS ASMEREW ENDESHAW,
Petitioner,
versus
U.S. IMMIGRATION & NATURALIZATION SERVICE,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals. (No. A75-369-717)
Submitted: October 17, 2001 Decided: November 26, 2001
Before NIEMEYER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Derege B. Demissie, DOHERTY & DEMISSIE, Cambridge, Massachusetts,
for Petitioner. Stuart E. Schiffer, Acting Assistant Attorney
General, Robert M. Loeb, Neaclesa Anderson, Appellate Staff, Civil
Division, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C.,
for Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Haile-Eyesus Asmerew Endeshaw, a native and citizen of
Ethiopia, petitions this court for review of a final order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) denying relief on his motions
to reopen removal proceedings and for reconsideration following the
issuance of a removal order in absentia. We have reviewed the
administrative record and Board’s order and find no abuse of dis-
cretion in the Board’s denial of relief. See Stewart v. INS, 181
F.3d 587, 595 (4th Cir. 1999); In re J-P-, Int. Dec. 3348 (BIA
1998); 8 U.S.C.A. § 1229a(e)(1) (West 1999).
We accordingly affirm the Board’s order. We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate-
ly presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.