Arthur O. Armstrong v. Brenda Flinclum

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-1221
ARTHUR O. ARMSTRONG,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
BRENDA FLINCLUM,
Defendant - Appellee.
No. 01-1222
ARTHUR O. ARMSTRONG,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
UC LENDING CORPORATION,
Defendant - Appellee.
No. 01-1223
ARTHUR O. ARMSTRONG,
Plaintiff - Appellant,

-- 1 of 3 --

2
versus
UC LENDING CORPORATION,
Defendant - Appellee.
No. 01-1224
ARTHUR O. ARMSTRONG,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
BENJAMIN S. MARKS, JR.,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Middle Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Durham. William L. Osteen, District
Judge. (MISC-00-98-1, MISC-00-99-1, MISC-00-100-1, MISC-00-101-1)
Submitted: May 3, 2001 Decided: May 17, 2001
Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Arthur O. Armstrong, Appellant Pro Se. Roger W. Knight, WYRICK,
ROBBINS, YATES & PONTON, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 2 of 3 --

3
PER CURIAM:
In these consolidated appeals, Arthur O. Armstrong appeals
district court orders dismissing his motions for leave to file law-
suits. We have reviewed the records and the district court orders
and find no error. Accordingly, we deny Armstrong’s motions for
leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeals as friv-
olous. We further deny Armstrong’s motions for summary judgment.
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conten-
tions are adequately presented in the materials before the court
and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED

-- 3 of 3 --