Michael Edward Fulcher v. D. A. BRAXTON, Warden, Department of Correc- tions Buckingham Correctional Center

00-7726Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit24 avr. 2001

Texte intégral

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-7726
MICHAEL EDWARD FULCHER,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
D. A. BRAXTON, Warden, Department of Correc-
tions Buckingham Correctional Center; MARK L.
EARLY,
Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge.
(CA-00-468)
Submitted: April 10, 2001 Decided: April 24, 2001
Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Mary Burnett Hatch, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellant. Virginia
Bidwell Theisen, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Rich-
mond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Michael Edward Fulcher seeks to appeal the district court’s
order dismissing as untimely his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A.
§ 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record and
the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Ac-
cordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the
appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Fulcher v.
Braxton, No. CA-00-468 (W.D. Va. Nov. 2, 2000). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate-
ly presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED

-- 2 of 2 --

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.