Michael Scott McRae v. James B. French

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-7492
MICHAEL SCOTT MCRAE,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
JAMES B. FRENCH,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Senior District
Judge. (CA-98-875-5-F-3)
Submitted: February 28, 2001 Decided: March 19, 2001
Before WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael Scott McRae, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III,
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North
Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Michael Scott McRae seeks to appeal the district court’s order
denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West
1994 & Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record and the district
court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate
judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certif-
icate of appealability, deny McRae’s motion for further production
of transcripts, and dismiss the appeal largely on the reasoning of
the district court. McRae v. French, No. CA-98-875-5-F-3 (E.D.N.C.
Oct. 3, 2000).
In an argument not addressed by the district court, McRae
asserts that the trial court improperly instructed the jury on in-
tent, effectively creating a mandatory presumption and relieving
the State of its burden of proof. Review of the record reveals
that this assertion is without merit. Accordingly, we deny a cer-
tificate of appealability and dismiss this claim as well. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED

-- 2 of 2 --