ROBERT T. WEIDOW, Reverend, Dr v. Richland County Detention Center

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-6922
ROBERT T. WEIDOW, Reverend, Dr.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
RICHLAND COUNTY DETENTION CENTER; JOSEPH R.
BOCHENEK, Colonel, CJM; RONALDO D. MYERS,
Assistant Director,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Columbia. Dennis W. Shedd, District Judge.
(CA-00-858-3)
Submitted: September 29, 2000 Decided: October 11, 2000
Before NIEMEYER and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Robert T. Weidow, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Robert T. Weidow appeals the district court’s order dismissing
without prejudice his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2000) com-
plaint. A dismissal without prejudice is not reviewable by the
court unless the reasons stated for the dismissal clearly disclose
that no amendment to the complaint could cure its defects. See
Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392, 10 F.3d 1064,
1066-67 (4th Cir. 1993). In the present case, the district court
properly found that Weidow failed to allege facts establishing
federal subject matter jurisdiction. Because Weidow could possibly
cure these defects by amending his complaint, we dismiss this
appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED

-- 2 of 2 --