Roosevelt Eison, Jr v. JOHN DOE, Director

00-6593Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit26 juin 2000

Texte intégral

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-6593
ROOSEVELT EISON, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
JOHN DOE, Director; CARLA J. SMALLS,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Charleston. Margaret B. Seymour, District Judge.
(CA-99-585-9-24RB)
Submitted: June 15, 2000 Decided: June 26, 2000
Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Cir-
cuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Roosevelt Eison, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Teresa A. Knox, Carl
Norman Lundberg, SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF PROBATION, PAROLE &
PARDON SERVICE, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Roosevelt Eison, Jr., appeals the district court’s order deny-
ing relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1999) complaint.
We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion
accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no revers-
ible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the dis-
trict court. See Eison v. Doe, No. CA-99-585-9-24RB (D.S.C. Mar.
29, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.