Earl Anderson Franklin v. LISA BLUE BOGGS, United States Attorney

00-6341Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit17 mai 2000

Texte intégral

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-6341
EARL ANDERSON FRANKLIN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
LISA BLUE BOGGS, United States Attorney; N.
CARLTON TILLEY, JR., U. S. District Judge;
WALTER C. HOLTON, JR., Assistant United States
Attorney,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Frank W. Bullock, Jr., Dis-
trict Judge. (CA-00-157-1)
Submitted: May 11, 2000 Decided: May 17, 2000
Before MURNAGHAN, LUTTIG, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Earl Anderson Franklin, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Earl Anderson Franklin appeals the district court’s order de-
nying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1999) complaint.
We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion
accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no revers-
ible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the dis-
trict court. See Franklin v. Boggs, No. CA-00-157-1 (E.D.N.C. Feb.
25, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.