Texte intégral
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-2534
JOHNNIE GRAY, widow of Henry Gray,
Petitioner,
versus
DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION
PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board.
(99-1107-BLA)
Submitted: May 24, 2001 Decided: August 7, 2001
Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Thomas E. Johnson, Phillip H. Snelling, JOHNSON, JONES, SNELLING,
GILBERT & DAVIS, P.C., Chicago, Illinois, for Petitioner. Judith
E. Kramer, Acting Solicitor of Labor, Donald S. Shire, Associate
Solicitor, Patricia M. Nece, Counsel for Appellate Litigation,
Sarah M. Hurley, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Washington,
D.C., for Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
* We have considered the recent revisions to the regulations
implementing the Black Lung Benefits Act, see Regulations Imple-
menting the Federal Coal Mine Health and Safety Act of 1969, as
amended; 65 Fed. Reg. 79,919 (Dec. 20, 2000), and have determined
that the revisions do not affect the outcome of this case.
2
PER CURIAM:
Johnnie Gray seeks review of the Benefits Review Board’s
decision and order affirming the administrative law judge’s denial
of black lung benefits pursuant to 30 U.S.C.A. §§ 901-945 (West
1986 & Supp. 2000). Our review of the record discloses that the
Board’s decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
Board.* See Gray v. DOWCP, No. 99-1107-BLA (BRB Oct. 19, 2000).
We grant Gray’s motion to submit this case on the briefs and
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --