Michael T. Johnson v. Tupperware, Incorporated

00-2316Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit13 févr. 2001

Texte intégral

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-2316
MICHAEL T. JOHNSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
TUPPERWARE, INCORPORATED,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Florence. C. Weston Houck, District Judge.
(CA-98-3282-4-17AK)
Submitted: February 8, 2001 Decided: February 13, 2001
Before WILKINS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael T. Johnson, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Michael T. Johnson appeals from the district court’s order
dismissing his complaint in which he alleged that he was dis-
criminated against on the basis of race and age and that he was
denied the effective assistance of counsel during his Workers’
Compensation proceedings. We have reviewed the record and the dis-
trict court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magis-
trate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
on the reasoning of the district court. Johnson v. Tupperware,
Inc., No. CA-98-3282-4-17AK (D.S.C. filed Sept. 19, 2000; entered
Sept. 20, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.