In re: Southern Pacific Funding Corporation

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-2286
In Re: SOUTHERN PACIFIC FUNDING CORPORATION,
Debtor.
BRENDA A. WALKER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
SOUTHERN PACIFIC FUNDING CORPORATION,
Claimant - Appellee,
and
CHICAGO TITLE FIELD SERVICE, INCORPORATED,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (CA-
99-3814-DKC, BK-99-1059)
Submitted: January 31, 2001 Decided: February 22, 2001
Before WILLIAMS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Cir-
cuit Judge.

-- 1 of 3 --

2
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Brenda A. Walker, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Joshua Lichtenstein,
SWIDLER, BERLIN, SHEREFF & FRIEDMAN, L.L.P., Washington, D.C., for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 2 of 3 --

* Chicago Title Field Service, Inc., has filed a request to
dismiss a portion of appeal and to strike portions of Walker’s
informal brief. Because Chicago Title Field Service, Inc., is not
a party to this appeal in this court, we deny the request.
3
PER CURIAM:
Brenda A. Walker appeals from the district court’s orders:
(1) affirming the bankruptcy court’s entry of default judgment
against her and (2) denying her motion for reconsideration. Our
review of the record and the district court’s opinion discloses no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
district court. Walker v. Southern Pacific Funding Corp., Nos. CA-
99-3814-DKC; BK-99-1059 (D. Md. filed Aug. 21, 2000; entered Aug.
22, 2000; Sept. 19, 2000). In light of this disposition, we deny
Walker’s motion to remand. * We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma-
terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED

-- 3 of 3 --