James H. Thompson v. Greenspring Tours, Incorporated

00-1905Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit19 déc. 2000

Texte intégral

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-1905
JAMES H. THOMPSON; LOIS G. THOMPSON; ALEXANDER
MURCHISON, JR.; SHAY TOOLES,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
versus
GREENSPRING TOURS, INCORPORATED,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judge. (CA-
99-2879-S)
Submitted: December 14, 2000 Decided: December 19, 2000
Before WIDENER, WILKINS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Francis A. Pommett, III, Esquire, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appel-
lants. Thomas S. Hood, Towson, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
James H. Thompson, Lois G. Thompson, Alexander Murchison, Jr.,
and Shay Tooles appeal the district court’s order granting summary
judgment to the Defendant in their 42 U.S.C.A. § 1981 action. We
have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of
the district court. See Thompson v. Greenspring Tours Inc., No.
CA-99-2879-S (D. Md. June 12, 2000). We dispense with oral argu-
ment because the facts and legal contentions are adequately pre-
sented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.