Steve Noppenberger v. Northrop Grumman Corporation

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-1124
STEVE NOPPENBERGER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Chief District Judge.
(CA-98-1742-JFM)
Submitted: May 11, 2000 Decided: May 18, 2000
Before MURNAGHAN, LUTTIG, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Steve Noppenberger, Appellant Pro Se. James Joseph Kelley, II,
Victoria E. Houck, MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS, Washington, D.C., for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Steve Noppenberger appeals the district court’s orders dis-
missing the majority of his claims, granting summary judgment in
favor of the Defendant as to his remaining claim, and denying his
motions to withdraw judgment and to compel disclosure or discovery
in his employment discrimination action. We have reviewed the rec-
ord and the district court’s opinions and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See
Noppenberger v. Northrop v. Grumman Corp., No. CA-98-1742-JFM (D.
Md. Dec. 23 & Mar. 25, 1999; Jan. 4, 2000). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --