Rhonda Jackson v. Edgefield County Water and Sewer Authority

26-1073United States Court Of Appeals For The 4th Circuit28 juil. 2026

Texte intégral

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 26-1073

DR. RHONDA L. JACKSON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

EDGEFIELD COUNTY WATER AND SEWER AUTHORITY; HOPE
CARROWAY,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at
Anderson. Donald C. Coggins, Jr., District Judge. (8:25-cv -11324-DCC)

Submitted: July 23, 2026 Decided: July 28, 2026

Before WYNN and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Rhonda L. Jackson, Appellant Pro Se. Jacob Melvin Thompson, III, TURNER PADGET
GRAHAM & LANEY, PA, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2

PER CURIAM:
Rhonda L. Jackson appeals the district court’s order adopting the recommendation
of the magistrate judge and dismissing Jackson’s civil complaint as barred by res judicata.
On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the informal brief. See 4th Cir. R.
34(b). Because Jackson’s informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s
disposition, she has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. See Jackson v. Lightsey,
775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014) (“The informal brief is an important document; under
Fourth Circuit rules, our review is limited to issues preserved in that brief.”). Accordingly,
we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.