Claude J. Clark v. SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY On Appeal from the United States…

1
NOT PRECEDENTIAL
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
No. 08-1531
CLAUDE J. CLARK,
Appellant
v.
SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY
On Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
(D.C. No. 06-cv-04497)
District Judge: Honorable Paul S. Diamond
Submitted December 8, 2008
Before: MCKEE, SMITH and ROTH, Circuit Judges.
(Filed: January 13, 2009)
OPINION
MCKEE, Circuit Judge.
Claude Clark appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of
the Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Agency (“SEPTA”) and against him on the

-- 1 of 2 --

2
claim he brought under the Americans with Disability Act, the Rehabilitation Act and
Pennsylvania Human Relations Act.
Since we write primarily for the parties who are familiar with the background of
this case, we need not repeat the factual or procedural history. We have reviewed Judge
Diamond’s thoughtful and careful Memorandum, dated January 24, 2008, in which the
district court explains why defendant is entitled to summary judgment and why plaintiff
is not. We can add little to the district court’s analysis and will therefore affirm
substantially for the reasons set forth in that Memorandum.

-- 2 of 2 --