Joanne Boyd v. CITIZENS BANK On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern…

NOT PRECEDENTIAL
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
___________
No. 07-2890
___________
JOANNE BOYD,
Appellant
v.
CITIZENS BANK
____________________________________
On Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
D.C. Civil Action No. 07-cv-02031
(Honorable J. Curtis Joyner)
____________________________________
Submitted Pursuant to Third Circuit LAR 34.1(a)
December 28, 2007
Before: SCIRICA, Chief Judge, HARDIMAN and ALDISERT, Circuit Judges.
(Filed: December 31, 2007 )
___________
OPINION OF THE COURT
___________
PER CURIAM.
Appellant, Joanne Boyd, appeals from the District Court’s order denying her
petition for a notice of appeal. For the reasons that follow, we will affirm.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
On May 18, 2007, Appellant filed a document titled “Petition for Notice of Appeal
from the Order of the Supreme Court of the United States Office of the Clerk.” The
District Court dismissed Appellant’s notice of appeal, in part, for failure to comply with
Fed. R. Civ. P. 3 and, in part, for lack of jurisdiction because it sought review of the
United States Supreme Court’s denial of Appellant’s writ of prohibition. Appellant
appeals and has filed a motion to supplement the record.
District courts do not have jurisdiction to review decisions by the United States
Supreme Court. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1330-1369. Accordingly, the District Court properly
dismissed Appellant’s notice of appeal for lack of jurisdiction.
For the foregoing reasons, we will affirm the judgment of the District Court.
Appellant’s motion to supplement the record is denied. The facts pleaded in Appellant’s
motion cannot cure the jurisdictional defect.

-- 2 of 2 --