Barry Chazin v. Marilyn Brooks

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
_____________
No. 07-1068
_____________
BARRY CHAZIN,
Appellant
v.
MARILYN BROOKS; THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF
THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA; THE ATTORNEY
GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
_______________
On Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
(D.C. No. 06-cv-02566)
District Judge: Honorable James T. Giles
Argued April 16, 2008
Before: SLOVITER, JORDAN, and ALARCÓN*, Circuit Judges
JUDGMENT ORDER
After consideration of the briefs and oral argument in the above case, the
appeal is dismissed because appellant has failed to state a valid claim of the denial of a
constitutional right. See Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473 (2000).
By the Court,
/s/ Dolores K. Sloviter
Circuit Judge
* Honorable Arthur L. Alarcón, Senior Judge, United States Court of Appeals for the
Ninth Circuit, sitting by designation.

-- 1 of 2 --

Chazin v. DA Philadelphia City et al.
07-1068
Page 2
Attest:
/s/Marcia M. Waldron
Clerk
Dated: April 28, 2008
smw/cc: Michael J. Kelly, Esq.
Joshua S. Goldwert, Esq.

-- 2 of 2 --