Cargill- Alliant, LLC v. Gpu Services, Inc. on Appeal From the United States District Court for the Eastern…

011605mo-pdfCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit1 févr. 2002

Texte intégral

NOT PRECEDENTIAL
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
No. 01-1605
CARGILL- ALLIANT, LLC,
Appellant
v.
GPU SERVICES, INC.
ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
(District Court No. 99-CV-5312)
District Court Judge: Edmund V. Ludwig
Argued on January 17, 2002
Before: ALITO and ROTH, Circuit Judges, and SCHWARZER, Senior District Judge.
(Opinion Filed: February 1, 2002)
BRAD FAGG (Argued)
Morgan, Lewis & Brockius, LLP
1800 M Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20036
Counsel for Appellant
ALFRED W. PUTN
(argued)
JEFF A. ALMEIDA
Drinker, Biddle & Reath, LLP
One Logan Square
18th and Cherry Streets
Philadelphia, PA 19107-3496
Counsel for Appellee
MEMORANDUM OPINION OF THE COURT

-- 1 of 2 --

PER CURIAM:
The facts and procedural background of this case are familiar to the parties. After
a bench trial, the District Court properly held for GPU Services. In its 47-page Opinion,
the District Court correctly concluded that GPU Services did not breach its contractual
obligations to Cargill-Alliant. Therefore, Appellant cannot recover from Appellee for its
alleged loss of $2.3 million. We have considered all of Appellant’s arguments and find
no ground to reverse.
The Order of the District Court is AFFIRMED.
TO THE CLERK OF THE COURT:
Kindly file the foregoing Opinion.
Circuit Judge

-- 2 of 2 --

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.