Texte intégral
N OTE: This order is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit
______________________
RICARDO J. CALDERON LOPEZ, dba Starlight
Consulting Services,
Plaintiff-Appellant
v.
LOS ANGELES COUNTY METROPOLITAN
TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, BEVERLY HILLS, CA,
Defendants-Appellees
______________________
2024-1998
______________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the
Central District of California in No. 2:23-cv-08579-DMG-
SHK, Judge Dolly M. Gee.
______________________
P ER CURIAM .
O R D E R
On January 3, 2024, the United States District Court
for the Central District of California dismissed Ricardo J.
Calderon Lopez’s complaint seeking relief against defend-
ants for alleged personal injuries. Mr. Calderon Lopez ap-
pealed that decision to the United States Court of Appeals
for the Ninth Circuit, which dismissed on March 26, 2024
for failure to prosecute. On June 11, 2024, Mr. Calderon
Case: 24-1998 Document: 4 Page: 1 Filed: 07/23/2024
-- 1 of 2 --
CALDERON LOPEZ v. LOS ANGELES COUNTY MTA 2
Lopez filed a notice of appeal directed to this court from a
decision entered “05/26/2024.” ECF No. 1-2 at 1.
We dismiss. To the extent Mr. Calderon Lopez in-
tended to appeal from the Ninth Circuit’s March 26, 2024
decision, this court lacks jurisdiction to review decisions of
the Ninth Circuit. See 28 U.S.C. § 1295. To the extent that
Mr. Calderon seeks review of a ruling by the district court,
we note that the district court’s docket does not list a deci-
sion issued on May 26, 2024 and an appeal from the dis-
missal order would be untimely. See Bowles v. Russell, 551
U.S. 205, 214 (2007) (“The timely filing of a notice of appeal
in a civil case is a jurisdictional requirement”).
Accordingly,
I T I S O RDERED T HAT :
(1) The appeal is dismissed.
(2) Each party shall bear its own costs.
July 23, 2024
Date
F OR THE COURT
Case: 24-1998 Document: 4 Page: 2 Filed: 07/23/2024
-- 2 of 2 --