Lakshmi Arunachalam v. Kronos Incorporated

N OTE: This order is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit
______________________
LAKSHMI ARUNACHALAM,
Plaintiff-Appellant
v.
KRONOS INCORPORATED,
Defendant-Appellee
______________________
2021-1948
______________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the
District of Delaware in No. 1:14-cv-00091-RGA, Judge
Richard G. Andrews.
______________________
ON MOTION
______________________
P ER CURIAM .
O R D E R
Kronos Incorporated moves to dismiss this appeal for
failure to prosecute. Lakshmi Arunachalam has not re-
sponded to the motion to dismiss.
On January 28, 2022, the court reactivated Dr. Aru-
nachalam’s appeal and set February 22, 2022, as the due
date for her informal brief. Alternatively, Dr.
Case: 21-1948 Document: 16 Page: 1 Filed: 06/01/2022

-- 1 of 2 --

ARUNACHALAM v. KRONOS INCORPORATED 2
Arunachalam was required to file her formal opening brief
by April 4, 2022. To date, however, no opening brief has
been filed.
“[F]ailure to comply with this court’s rules, including
the requirements for preparing and filing briefs, appen-
dices and other papers, may result in dismissal of an ap-
peal for failure to prosecute.” Julien v. Zeringue, 864 F.2d
1572, 1574 (Fed. Cir. 1989) (citations omitted).
Upon consideration thereof,
I T I S O RDERED T HAT :
(1) The motion to dismiss is granted.
(2) Each side shall bear its own costs.
(3) All pending motions are denied as moot.
June 1, 2022
Date
F OR THE COURT
/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner
Peter R. Marksteiner
Clerk of Court
ISSUED AS MANDATE: June 1, 2022
Case: 21-1948 Document: 16 Page: 2 Filed: 06/01/2022

-- 2 of 2 --