Apeldyn Corporation v. Au Optronics Corporation and Au Optronics Corporation America

2012-1172Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit6 juil. 2012

Texte intégral

<!-- PageHeader="NOTE: This order is nonprecedential." -->

# United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

APELDYN CORPORATION,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
V.
AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION AND
AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION AMERICA,
Defendants-Appellees,

AND
CHI MEI OPTOELECTRONICS CORPORATION
AND CHI MEI OPTOELECTRONICS USA INC.,
Defendants-Appellees,
AND
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. AND
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.,
Defendants.

2012-1172

Appeal from the United States District Court for the
District of Delaware in case no. 08-CV-0568, Judge Sue L.
Robinson.

<!-- PageBreak -->

<!-- PageHeader="APELDYN CORP v. AU OPTRONICS" -->

## APELDYN CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant,

V.
AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION AND
AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION AMERICA,
Defendants-Appellees,

AND
CHI MEI OPTOELECTRONICS CORPORATION
AND CHI MEI OPTOELECTRONICS USA INC.,
Defendants-Appellees,
AND
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. AND
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.,
Defendants.

2012-1173

Appeal from the United States District Court for the
District of Delaware in case no. 08-CV-0568, Judge Sue L.
Robinson.

ON MOTION

## ORDER

Apeldyn Corporation ("Apeldyn") moves, unopposed,
for an extension of time. Specifically, Apeldyn requests
that its deadline to designate materials for the appendix
and to file its statement of issues be extended to August 6,
2012; that its deadline to file its certificate of compliance

<!-- PageBreak -->

<!-- PageHeader="APELDYN CORP v. AU OPTRONICS" -->

with Federal Circuit Rule 11(d) be extended to Septem-
ber 7, 2012; and that its deadline to file its opening brief
be extended to September 21, 2012. Apeldyn also moves
to withdraw its appeal from the district court order dis-
qualifying McKenna Long & Aldridge ("McKenna Long")
from representing Apeldyn against Samsung, appeal
2012-1173. McKenna Long moves to withdraw as counsel
for Apeldyn.

Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) Apeldyn's motion for an extension of time is
granted.

(2) Apeldyn's motion to withdraw appeal 2012-1173 is
granted. Appeal 2012-1173 is dismissed. Each side shall
bear its own costs in 2012-1173. The revised official
caption in 2012-1172 is reflected above.

(3) McKenna Long's motion to withdraw as counsel for
Apeldyn is granted.

(4) All other pending motions are denied as moot.

FOR THE COURT

JUL 06 2012

/s/ Jan Horbaly

Date

Jan Horbaly Clerk

cc: Gaspare J. Bono, Esq.
Don H. Marmaduke, Esq.
Terrence Duane Garnett, Esq.
Donald R. McPhail, Esq.
Neil Phillip Sirota, Esq.

FILED
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR
THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT
JUL 0 6 2012
JAN HORBALY
CLERK

<!-- PageBreak -->

<!-- PageHeader="APELDYN CORP v. AU OPTRONICS" -->

s25

ISSUED AS A MANDATE (as to 2012-1173 only): JUL 0 6 2012

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.